回复: 求解释一句话
多谢！我的困惑大概是源于我之前没看出“the worth of courage changing”就是“the change in courage's worth”。
附上整段原文，不知我现在的理解是否正确：
Finally, suppose the realist takes the apparent consequence of his position seriously, and denies supervenience. Then he holds that it is possible that the worth of, say, a feature of human life, such as courage, should alter, although its intrinsic nature, consequences, relation to our desires, and so forth remain the same. The only conclusion is that it is possible that the worth of courage should be irrelevant to our interest in it, attitudes toward it, or preparedness to urge it on our children or to criticize or commend someone for possessing it. For when moral truth is that pure there can be no reason for being interested in it—nothing hangs upon the worth of courage changing if its relation to everything perceptible remains the same, and no reason could possibly be given for being interested in this fact.
