• 由于资源中心转移的缘故,目前有很多条目所属分类并不正确。所以大家查找内容的时候,最好使用资源中心的搜索功能。如果你发现明显的归类错误,也可以任何形式予以反馈,我们会及时予以纠正。
概念“马”的悖论与维特根斯坦的概念研究

【英语】 概念“马”的悖论与维特根斯坦的概念研究 1st Edition

无下载权限
所属丛书系列
Ashgate Wittgensteinian Studies

书名: The Concept 'Horse' Paradox and Wittgensteinian Conceptual Investigations: A Prolegomenon to Philosophical Investigations (Ashgate Wittgensteinian Studies)
作者: Kelly Dean Jolley (Author)
出版社: Ashgate (October 25, 2007)
语言: English
ISBN-10: 0754660451
ISBN-13: 978-0754660453

Book Description
In The Foundations of Arithmetic, Gottlob Frege contended that the difference between concepts and objects was absolute. He meant that no object could be a concept and no concept an object. Benno Kerry disagreed; he contended that a concept could be an object, and that therefore the difference between concepts and objects was only relative.

In this book, Jolley aims to understand the debate between Frege and Kerry. But Jolley's purpose is not so much to champion either side; rather, it is to utilize an understanding of the debate to shed light on the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein-and vice versa. Jolley not only sifts through the debate between Frege and Kerry, but also through subsequent versions of the debate in J. J. Valberg and Wilfred Sellars. Jolley's goal is to show that the central notion of Philosophical Investigations, that of a 'conceptual investigation', is a legacy of the Frege/Kerry debate and also a contribution to it.

Jolley concludes that the difference between concepts and objects is as absolute in its way in Philosophical Investigations as it was in The Foundations of Arithmetic and that recognizing the absoluteness of the difference in Philosophical Investigations provides a beginning for a 'resolute' reading of Wittgenstein's book.

Review
'In this fascinating and demanding study, Kelly Jolley uses the history of Frege’s notorious “concept horse paradox” to illuminate Wittgenstein’s conception of philosophy as a form of therapy. Jolley’s careful study of responses to the paradox sheds light on the nature of philosophical perplexity and the power and form of the Wittgensteinian response to such perplexity. Jolley also builds a persuasive case for the continuity both of Frege’s influence on Wittgenstein and of Wittgenstein’s concern with a therapeutic response to philosophical problems. This is a book which should command the attention not only of scholars of Frege and Wittgenstein, but also of anyone interested in the nature of conceptual analysis and investigation.' -- Michael Kremer, University of Chicago USA

‘Jolley's book is a deceptively thin volume, and a deceptively unassuming one. For all that its contents may be intimidating to non-philosophers, it's worth taking the time to read, and to read carefully, for its target is nothing less than the nature of structured thought itself.’ -- Metapsychology online

About the Author
Kelly Dean Jolley is Chair of the Department of Philosophy, Auburn University, USA.
作者
teiler
下载
170
查看
657
文件扩展名
rar
文件大小
488.3 KB
首次发布
最后更新
评分
0.00 星 0 星

来自teiler的更多资源

顶部